Which of the following best describes the appeal of using a percentage of construction cost method?

The appeal of using a percentage of construction cost method lies in its ability to align the architect's interests with the client's project scope. This payment structure incentivizes architects to participate actively in the project's success, as their compensation grows in relation to the overall construction costs. This means that as the project expands or improves in scope—benefiting both the architect's professional input and the client's investment—the architect is financially rewarded in a way that is directly linked to the project's overall financial outlay.

This method fosters collaboration and encourages architects to ensure that the project is executed efficiently and effectively, thereby motivating them to add value to the project. Since the architect's fees are based on the total cost of the construction, they are more likely to consider the client's needs and objectives throughout the design and building process, ultimately leading to a better alignment of interests between both parties.

In contrast, the other options suggest benefits that do not capture the essence of this payment method as effectively. The first option suggests a financial reward for larger projects, which does occur but may not necessarily encourage optimal design or efficiency. The second option implies a feasibility of fee adjustments, which can be managed separately from this specific payment structure. The last one erroneously associates profit margins exclusively with contractors rather than considering